Deliberate checks to the head are not only
the cause of many major injuries in hockey today, but they are also the
cause of much of the violence that occurs on the ice. When a teammate
receives a vicious check to the head, players become infuriated and often
go out of their way to seek revenge. These actions thus cause a great deal
of strife for the referee and tend to bring out the worst in parents and
coaches.
This is a little quiz for all of the "hockey experts" who sit
in the stands "helping out" the referees with timely advice
whenever an opponent comes close to their children on the ice. It is also
for the "certified" coaches who think they know more about the
rules than the officials and are quick to put on a demonstration for the
fans when they disagree with a call. Finally, it is for all of the
innocent minor hockey players who are always getting penalties for no
reason at all.
Just for a moment, imagine that you could muster up enough raw courage
to put on your skates, pull on a striped jersey and allow yourself to
spend an hour and a half as a target of abuse for dozens of
"responsible adults" who can’t wait for an opportunity to
verbally assault you every time they disagree with one of your decisions.
Under those conditions, what call would you have made in each of the two
photos that accompany this article?
Think about it for a minute.
We had two members of the 2001-2002 Valley East Rebels Tim Horton Minor
Atoms take part in this demonstration. The player on the left is Kirk
Vendramin, while his team mate receiving the punishment is Kyle Kaven.
Both of the actions of Kirk Vendramin will most likely result in a
2-minute minor plus a 10 minute misconduct!
All local minor hockey officials have been given very precise
directions about their responsibilities with respect to the calling of the
Head Checking penalty. Head Checking will be called every time, if, in the
opinion of the referee, a player propels himself, or any part of his body,
at the head of an opponent with the intent to make contact. Not with the
intent to injure - merely with the intent to make contact. Let me repeat.
If you are skating towards an opponent, you are in motion. If there is
distance between you and your opponent and you must move towards that
opponent, you are propelling yourself. If you propel your body or any part
of your body - this means a shoulder, an arm, a hand, the side of your
body, your hip, or any other part of your body - towards the head of an
opponent and you make contact with the head, you will be called for
head-checking.
According to Mr. Glen Campbell, Director of Officials for the N.O.H.A.,
"A shoulder to the head is head-checking. The old clean check to the
head does not exist anymore. Referees discretion for the minor and
misconduct, or major and game misconduct, or match penalty will be decided by
the degree of contact. (The harder the contact, the greater the penalty)
Supervisors must inform officials that head checking must be called. This
infraction was introduced because players were being allowed to make
contact in the head area with their gloves, forearms and shoulders with no
call being made."
The signal for a head check is an open hand to the side of the helmet.
When you see that signal, you know the player is receiving a head checking
penalty and will sit in the penalty box at least 10 minutes or be given a
Game Misconduct.
The purpose of this new rule is obviously to crack down on the
increasing number of concussions which have been received by players in
recent years. In the "old days" players had more respect for
their opponents because they didn’t have face masks or helmets. Head
checking was considered unsportsmanlike. Today, players think that because
of the protection, they can hit the head at will.
The new rule is expected to be strictly enforced during the early weeks
in order to bring home the severity of the infraction. At the present
time, there are other rules which have created much confusion and
misplaced anger among fans and coaches. One of the most misunderstood
rules is the "automatic 5-minute major and game misconduct for any
cross check to the head area". Another is the "hitting from
behind" penalty. A third is the slashing to the hand area call. When
you hit another player in the head with a cross-check, the referee has no
choice but to give you a major penalty and a game misconduct. It is a
dangerous act and you must be held accountable for your actions. No amount
of complaining or yelling will change the fact that the referee must make
the call.
The Head-Checking rule will no doubt upset many parents, players and
coaches. Indeed, it may even result in the odd bench minor or game
misconduct for some coaches. Nevertheless, the check to the head must be
looked upon in the same manner as the hit from behind; the slash to the
wrist; the cross check to the head and the slash in the back of the leg.
These are all acts of cowardice and must be condemned if the sport of
hockey is to survive. The faster we can get rid of the players who are
only out to injure or instigate trouble, the sooner the game will once
again be recognized as the greatest sport in the world. When the call is
made on your child or your player, direct your anger appropriately. The
referee is only enforcing the rules - he didn’t break them.
The Head Checking Rule is simple. If a player is in motion, and if that
player propels himself in the direction of his opponent, and if the player
makes contact with the head area, he will be given a head checking penalty
and possible be suspended for a number of games.
According to a Canadian Hockey Association Information Bulletin, the
Checking to the Head penalty call is based on the "degree of violence
of impact".
Minimal impact will generally result in a elbowing, high-sticking,
roughing or other type of minor penalty as long as the blow was a glancing
one with minimal impact to the head area.
Moderate impact involves a more significant blow to the head.
Severe impact is one of those actions where the opponent is definitely
trying to take the victim's head off.
In the case of moderate and severe impact, a minor plus misconduct, or major plus a game
misconduct is to be called in all cases.