I
recently received an email signed off “Yours in Officiating.”
I stopped to think about whether I’d ever used that same turn
of phrase when writing to a fellow official.
I cannot remember having done it, but I cannot clearly say I
never have. From now on, I
will never sign anything “Yours in Officiating.”
This simple phrase is an example of exactly why there is such
distance between officials and the rest of the hockey world.
Players and coaches, as groups, do not oppose one another.
Many have a healthy dislike for politics, but they still
understand the need for administration and appreciate, at a minimum, the
fact that these people volunteer so much of their time so that hockey
associations can continue to exist.
Officials do the same thing as these administrative volunteers,
but that same appreciation is all too frequently absent.
As officials we like to blame the players and coaches.
We do it all the time. Sometimes
they really are just unreasonable human beings, but that is not the norm
in the human population. If
it were, reasonable would
simply have a different definition to fit the majority.
Administrators, players and coaches sign “Yours in Hockey.”
Officials sign “Yours in Officiating.”
The biggest problem is that the officiating world separates
itself from the rest of hockey.
We
use the catch phrases all the time.
“We must be held to a higher standard.”
“We’re the only ones out there not trying to win at all
costs.” “We are the
ones responsible for the safety of the players.”
“It is up to us to ensure that the results are fair.”
Each and every one of those statements means the same thing: We
are better than them. We
are different and we are ever so important and they could not play
hockey without us. With
that kind of arrogance, is it any wonder that we are disliked?
The time has come to turn the tables.
It is time to integrate officials back into the culture of hockey
and break down the barriers that have been set between players and refs.
Officials
must remember always that hockey comes first and officiating second.
Hockey is what we love, and officiating is what gives us the
chance to stay in the game. Without
the game in the first place, officiating would not be there to keep us
in it. We are not separate
at all. We are an integral
part of the game at ice level, but we are only there because the players
need us to be there. We
need them even more. They
give us the opportunity to skate. A
little less than a year ago, I began to incorporate something new into
my refereeing. I have
always been a vocal referee, communicating with players constantly
during the play but near the end of last season I began to add some new
comments to my referee’s vocabulary.
I started to tell players things like “nice check, Blue,”
“good defence red,” “good clearance,” and “beauty of a
pass.” I had done this
from time to time before, but I really began to make it part of my game
during a Midget tournament. Something
amazing happened: the games got better.
Not only did I deal with less whining and complaining and call
fewer penalties, the games themselves actually became faster, more
competitive and just, plain better hockey.
When I began to show verbally an appreciation for good plays by
players of both teams, they seemed not only to see me differently, but
even their opponents.
It
is commonplace to hear a referee say “nice save” to the goalie as he
skates to his face-off positions, or for the linesmen to come into a
goalmouth scrum after the whistle and say “good hustle” but it is
often such a mechanical response that the players can see it as
ingenuous. When you react
immediately to a good play, the players can see that you respect their
efforts and respect the game. It
allows you to be more openly communicative with players when trouble
does come up. For example,
in the Australian Ice Hockey League this past June, I called an elbowing
penalty against a Newcastle player.
He saw the Canberra attacker coming on quickly and, out of sheer
reaction, lifted his arm up and the Canberra player skated right into
the arm. That player was
visibly annoyed with the call, and it was my first game in this league,
so I knew none of the players. Because
of the way I communicate during play, I was able to tell this player at
the penalty box that I knew it was a simple reaction, that he had not
intentionally elbowed this player and explain to him that, with
Newcastle leading by a wide margin, if I had not made the call, then
Canberra might have come out looking for revenge and the game would then
take a downward turn. The
player relaxed a bit after that. He
was still annoyed at being penalized, but now he was annoyed for a
different reason. At first
he was annoyed because I had made what he thought was a bad call.
Now he was annoyed that it happened to be him that ended up the
sacrificial lamb for the sake of a clean finish to the hockey game.
After the game, the teams and officials went out for some food
and a veteran player on the Newcastle team came up to me and told me
that the elbowing call was the turning point of the game; without it the
game would have gone downhill fast.
All of that happened because I counted myself a part of the
hockey game, an equal participant, and not an imposing authority.
All
of hockey’s participants need to realize that we have a common goal:
good hockey. We all want to
see hard-fought, competitive hockey where everyone has a level of
respect for the game’s other participants.
That is not accomplished by separating ourselves from each other
but by realizing that we are all part of the same thing: hockey.
Officials, players and coaches should all come together to
achieve our common goal. Every
month or two, we should all get out on the ice on a Saturday morning and
play some shinny together. Afterwards
we should all watch Hockey Night in Canada and enjoy some good food
while we talk hockey – not just coaching, not just officiating, and
not just playing, but hockey. Remember
always this simple phrase:
Be
a Fan at Heart.
And
so I sign off this editorial:
Yours
in Hockey,
Duncan
C. Pike
Player,
Coach, Official and Fan