Editorial By:
Robert Kirwan
President and CEO
Infocom Canada Business Consultants Inc.

If you really want to bring an end to the increasing violence and anger which is taking the fun out of hockey, all you have to do is allow fighting! Sound like a bold statement being made by a person who is out of his mind? Perhaps…but it is definitely something to think about.

Each year I see more and more players developing reckless and fearless habits. As soon as they step on the ice they know that the Rules, Officials, and Equipment are there to protect them. It is clear that many players have absolutely no respect for their opponents’ physical or emotional well-being. And every year as we institute new rules and come up with new safety features in playing equipment, it is merely giving disrespectful players more incentive to find ways to become even more violent in an effort to inflict pain on an opponent.

Hockey administrators and organizations have been unable to put an end to this growth in the violent trend that the game has taken on. So perhaps it is time to let another group of people have an opportunity to see what they can do. That group of people may very well be the players themselves.

In the "old days" hockey players had respect for each other. And if a player didn’t have respect for the physical well-being of his opponents, it wasn’t long before someone on the other side "beat a little respect into him" with his fists. The old-timers didn’t whine and complain because the referees failed to call a penalty on an opponent who slashed him on the head, or who speared him in the back of the legs. He simply dropped his gloves and gave his opponent a lesson in respect and fair play. Hockey was fun in the old days. And fighting was an integral part of the game – not for aggressive participants who were trying to prove how tough they were – but for teaching players that the rules were to be obeyed and respect was important.

Today the rules, the equipment and the people who are actually trying to improve safety and fair-play are failing to achieve their goals.

Every team has at least a few players who think that they are the toughest players in the world. They are the ones who would try to challenge the entire world to a fight if they could. However, in reality, most of these players are really nothing more than cowards who like to make a lot of noise, only as long as they know the referee and linesmen are there to protect them. Only a select few of these players are actually able to back up their reckless play with toughness, and those players usually have enough respect to pick fights with other players of similar status.

The cowards of hockey know that they can use the rules and the equipment to protect themselves from being hurt or punished by the other players. These are the players who will use their sticks as weapons, and won’t even think of fighting until the Linesmen get in between him and an opponent. They are the ones who throw punches over the Linesmen’s shoulders and plainly have no respect for the other players on the ice.

One of the main duties of a referee is to ensure the safety of all players, coaches and fans while a game is taking place. The referee is obligated to protect these reckless and disrespectful players no matter how much it may upset them to do so, but hockey leaders should be doing something else about these players instead of relying on the referee to deal with them.

A lot of armchair hockey experts who played themselves in the old days would like to see hockey go back to the old ways of allowing fighting at the Minor Hockey level (at least at the Bantam and Midget age groups). This would allow the players to police themselves instead of always relying on the Referee to keep his eye on the play at all times.

In almost every game played in minor hockey today, you can see players skate around like they own the ice because they know that there is no fighting allowed and that even if they do happen to get into a fight, the equipment, such as the full face-mask will protect their precious faces from getting bruised and cut up. Something has to be done about these players and the responsibility of keeping players accountable for their actions should not only rest with the Referee. Hockey should give the other players on the ice an opportunity to bring a little bit of respect back into the game. Fighting is arguably one way to accomplish this!

For instance, what would you rather see - two players fight or a player use a stick as a weapon? Most would rather see two players drop the gloves and swing wildly or wrestle to the ground for a couple of minutes instead of viciously swinging a stick. In the average hockey fight, you are lucky if more than two punches actual land on each other’s faces or helmets. On the other hand, a slash to the ankle or wrist can put a player out of commission for weeks or even months with a broken bone. A player knows that he may only sit out one or two games for a slash to the wrist area and this is fine with them because they may have injured the other player for months. The punishment certainly doesn’t fit the crime If fighting were allowed, the player about to slash an opponent across the wrist in the hopes of injuring him would think twice if he knew that immediately after slashing this player, there is a very good chance that he will have to protect himself with his fists. He will think twice about slashing the opponent.

Most people, including myself, do not like fighting, yet I am convinced that fighting will bring back some respect into the game. It is very much like vaccinations for the flu. In order to protect against a major illness, you have to accept a minor infection. The end result is a much better "body".

The same is true with the situation today in hockey. Everyone is trying to eliminate unnecessary violence, and this is a good objective. However, it is my opinion that if we want to reduce the overall amount of violence in the game, we may have to introduce a little bit of violence first.

There is no doubt about it - Fighting is violence. In a street fight people will get seriously hurt, but in a hockey fight the Linesmen will only allow two players to fight until one of the players is unable to protect himself anymore. Then the Linesmen will split up the two players. Furthermore, as players start to develop respect for one another they are unlikely to continue to pound on their opponent when he can no longer protect himself. Once the lesson is taught, it is time to get up, go to the penalty box and serve the time.

The only time players go out of control in a fight is when they know they will be kicked out of the game. At that point they will do everything they can to get in the last punch. In the O.H.L. players break up from fights easily and quickly because they know they are only going to the penalty box for five minutes and then they can come out and play again.

In addition, fighting takes a lot of energy out of a person and unless you are in tip-top shape, you will not be able to cause much damage in a fight. Most players at the Minor Hockey Level are not in tip-top shape. This limits the possible injury to a player who loses a fight.

Furthermore, do not think for a second that if fighting was brought back to the Minor Hockey level that all that would happen is fight after fight. You will have your goal scorers who will not fight and your fighters who will fight each other. The majority of the players will not fight because getting punched in the face, although it does not hurt as much as a slash on the bone, still stings a little bit.

It is my opinion that if fighting was brought back into minor hockey, especially at the Bantam and Midget levels, you would definitely see the game of hockey cleaned up. You would see a lot less violent stick work being done. Of course, there would still be the usual slash here and there throughout a game but the dirty slashes or spears behind the legs or on the wrists and ankles would be eliminated. This is because if a player receives a dirty, vicious slash in the back of the legs, either he or his enforcer (team fighter) will fight the player guilty of the slash or spear. The player will realize that he will not be able to slash or spear an opponent without having to fight his way out of it.

Let me tell you a true story about a game which was played last season. The names of the teams are fictitious to protect the identities of the players.

One of the players from the Leafs was skating around taunting the players from the Flames during the warm-ups. The officials knew that the player with the big mouth was really a coward and would never get into a fight, but he was constantly trying to get under the skin of his opponents.

Sure enough it wasn’t but two minutes into the game before this player had his first slashing penalty and he had the other team already mad at him. The player from the Leafs recognized which player from the Flames was the best/most talented goal scorer and this player went right after him. He slashed the Flames star across the upper arm and then laughed as he was assessed the penalty. As soon as one of the tough guys from the other Flames came to the defence of his top goal scorer, the player who had just slashed the goal scorer skated away and stood behind the referee. He literally stood behind the referee while the linesmen had to hold back the tough guy from the Flames.

The Leafs player then had the nerve to argue with the referee about why he did not assess the Flames’ player a penalty for punching him in the head

The game went smoothly for the next couple of minutes while this Leafs player was in the penalty box. But as soon as the penalty had expired and this player was back on the ice, the play started to get chippy and the Flames players were trying to get some revenge on the cowardly Leafs player.

The Leafs player got out of the first period with his life still in tact but half way through the second period, the Leafs player slashed another Flames player across the shin pad with enough force to send the Flames player to the ice. Once again the referee signalled a delayed penalty by raising his arm in the air, but before he could blow the whistle the Flames’ tough guy was already challenging the Leafs’ player to a fight.

So, as expected the Leafs’ player kept backing away until the Linesmen got in between the two players. As soon as the Linesmen got between the two players, the Leafs’ player actually threw a punch over one of the Linesman’s shoulders, just narrowly missing his face.

It was at this point that the referee yelled out, "Let them Fight!"

The Linesmen backed away from the two players and now they were left standing toe to toe. No one will forget the look on the Leaf player’s face when he heard the referee say those words, "Let them Fight!". He no longer had the protection of the Linesmen to hide behind and he knew that he was going to get what he had coming to him.

His face dropped and a look of panic and fear over took him. It was a look of sheer terror and you could tell that he finally got the message that he could no longer hide behind the officials any longer. Just before the Flames player was about to pummel the Leaf player, the referee told the linesmen to split them up and they both went to the penalty box for a couple of minutes. Of course the Leaf player received the extra two minutes for the slash, thus giving the Flames a power play.

For the rest of the game, the mouthy Leaf player never touched a Flames’ player

In summary, I personally feel that if players are going to gain respect for one another then the rules must be changed to allow a bit of fighting back into the game. We have to get rid of the cowards who hide behind the rules. Bring back fighting and watch the stick work disappear.

After all, what do we have to lose? Nothing else appears to be working and unless something is done soon, our favourite winter pastime will continue to suffer and the next generation will find other recreational pursuits instead.

It’s at least something to think about!

 

YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS EDITORIAL WOULD BE APPRECIATED 

  

I have refereed all levels of hockey for the past 25 years and I have seen first hand what happens when players face the possibility of having to drop them and go toe to toe with someone else.

Of course I do not want to see the riots like the old Canadian and Nordique games where everyone was throwing fists, but allow 2 players the chance to drop them and watch what happens to the remainder of the game after the fight as compared to a cowardly crosscheck from behind in the back of the neck.

In virtually every game I have referee where a fair 1 on 1 fight breaks out, the game has ended without any dangerous sticking of one player on another, but yet if during the game the stick work starts without any fighting, you can almost guarantee there will be other dangerous dirty incidents to follow.

It even seems that a fair toe to toe fight between players have a calming effect on the rest of the players, like as if to say, “OK things are settled now”.

Case in point is a young adult game I refereed about 3 years ago, there were a few bumps along the boards right in front of the penalty bench when one of the players got a crosscheck up too high on the back of another player while he was looking down trying to kick the puck free.

My partner and I (doing the game with 2 referees) blew the whistle for the penalty just as they both turned face to face and the yelling started at one another.

Once we (the referees) got to the two players to break it up, they both backed up from us and each other about 15 feet and dropped the gloves, took off the helmet and face masks and where ready to go with the fists warming up in the wind with the speed of a humming bird’s wings.

My referee partner and I (who worked a lot of games together) backed up and shouted to the other players, “STAND BACK AND LET THEM GO, ANYONE TOUCHES THEM AND YOU’RE GOING TO THE SHOWER EARLY”.

No sooner did we get the words out of our mouth when both players stopped, looked at us referees and simultaneously made a beeline about 6 feet to their respective penalty benches without so much as a single concern for their $400 worth of equipment lying on the ice.

After we assessed the penalties the rest of the game was so quiet and polite it was almost sickening. Players where actually saying sorry to one another.

What had happened is exactly what you wrote; “the players gained respect for one another”, because they knew the players would settle things, not the referees.

In my opinion, the Todd Bertuzzi, Steve Moore thing happened out of pure “DISRESPECT” between the players.

While refereeing both Minor and adult hockey in the last few years in the games I have refereed, there was about a 20/1 ratio of MATCH penalties (intent to injure) to fighting Majors.

Hockey and its critics have done a very good job at eliminating the violence of fighting, but it has been replaced by very dangerous and injury causing “INTENT TO INJURE” MATCH penalties.

The old saying rings true, “Careful what you wish for”.

Don

   
Respectfully, I could not disagree more. That is just policing violence with violence. I have never bought the argument of fighting vs. stick-work. To me, that has always just been an excuse to allow fighting (and it is still allowed because it is just another penalty -- whether 5 minutes or not). Why is it that there is a dramatic decrease in fighting AND cheap-shots in playoff and International hockey? It's because there is more at stake. No, violence of any kind in hockey is just a matter of discipline and until players are tossed from the game for it as in other sports (ie: truly not allowed) it will just continue and we will keep making excuses for it.

In another editorial, you talk about styles of play that slows the game. Does fighting not slow the game? Look at the bigger picture... What talent are we passing up because they are not big or tough enough to play in this style of play? With no violence, I see players forced to play a fast, exciting hockey ALL year... not just at playoff time.
Sincerely,
Brent Newson
Editor's Comments:
You make some excellent points, Brent. Fighting is allowed at the OHL and Professional Levels for two reasons. First of all, fighting is entertaining and fans like it. Even the people who are against fighting will never change the channel or leave the rink when a fight is on. Secondly, fighting is allowed at those levels in order to protect the skilled players on the team and to "demand respect" from opponents. 

As for removing violence from other professional sports, don't kid yourself, most of the other sports are just as violent if not more so than hockey. My son played high school football in his final year of secondary school and then played on the hockey team after the football season ended. I always thought hockey was rough until I saw football.

The above editorial was about one thing - getting rid of the cowards and cheap-shot artists who are destroying the game for others. The rules today protect them. Bobby Clarke and Bill Barber both played for the Philadelphia Flyers when they were the "Broad Street Bullies". They were two of the best "cheap-shot" artists in the game, always sticking people and getting them riled up. They never had to fight on the ice because they were surrounded with fighters who dropped their gloves to protect their "trouble-making" stars. Today, we've taken out fighting at the minor levels, so the "cheap-shot"  artists are simply getting better and better at what they do.

If we are going to kick a player out for fighting, then we should kick a player out for elbowing; high sticking; roughing; boarding; slashing; and charging. All of those actions include components of a fight and all of those actions have as much potential for doing damage as fighting. Furthermore, they all are done to "victims" who are often innocent. Fighting rarely takes place between two players who are not 'willing combatants'. Usually a fight begins because of an elbow, high stick, etc. A fight starts with a punch. So if a player punches another player, why just give him a roughing penalty? Why not call it fighting and kick the one player out? Most people do not call it a fight until the gloves come off. However, only an idiot would drop his gloves in a fight and hit a helmet and cage with bare knuckles.

Thank you for your comment, but I truly think we must avoid focusing our attention on the single issue of fighting and take a look at the entire beast.

 
 

 

Copyright © 2011 All Rights Reserved
Infocom Canada Business Consultants Inc.
Phone: (705) 969-7215      Email
rkirwan@infocomcanada.com